Case StudiesCASE
Here are introduced some of the main companies using Lightning Review.
Introduced over 150 companies and 13,000 users
Since its launch in 2017, Lightning Review has been used mainly in the software development and hardware design fields at major manufacturing companies.
Here are some of our customers. (In alphabetical order) *Updated October 2024
List of Cases
-
AISIN CORPORATION Software Engineering Department
The handwritten recording makes it easier to convey indications
It is also expected to improve the quality of reviews and deliverables -
Toyota Motor Corporation New Business Planning Department
Indications can be conveyed as well as face-to-face
Review in distribution format without stress on site -
RYOMO SYSTEMS CO., LTD. Embedded Solutions Department
Able to point out as if writing directly into the model
Easy and full recording to utilize data for analysis -
TOSEI SYSTEMS CO.,LTD.
"Review of reviews" becomes possible at any time
Many ideas for improvement have been generated by the review -
Sumitomo Forestry Information Systems Co., Ltd.
Working Group led by young developers
To grow into an organization that can utilize information on issues pointed out and run the improvement cycle on its own
Customer voice
Here are some comments from companies using Lightning Review.
The following is a list of the effects and issues of implementation, so please refer to it for reference when considering implementation.
System development, software development
Problems and points become easier to be conveyed
View in detail
Worries
- In the review with the remote place such as the telework worker, it was difficult to convey the indication/correction content, and the correction result was sometimes mistaken.
Improvements
- Since you can exchange information with images and text, you can exchange information as if you were talking face-to-face.
Effects after introduction
- I was able to tell them where the problems were and how they were fixed as if I were talking face-to-face.
Worries
- Issues are managed in a variety of ways, such as using papers or Excel, and are not standardized. therefore, external personnel do not know the status of review.
Improvements
- It is both easy to record on paper and easy to manage Excel.
Effects after introduction
- We were able to unify the management methods and external members were able to check the status of the reviews.
Manufacturing (Transportation) and software Development
Reduced errors in correcting deliverables and reduced man-hours
View in detail
Worries
- The points pointed out in the diagrams and tables in the design document are not conveyed correctly, and incorrect corrections are made.
Improvements
- Problem areas can be pointed out directly and understood by everyone.
Effects after introduction
- Reduced errors in corrections and unnecessary rework. The correction man-hour was also able to be reduced.
Worries
- I don't understand the Q&A sent to me by overseas contractors. There was an exchange of content confirmation, and it took a long time to respond.
Improvements
- You can clarify where you want to ask about the image. By replacing the indication/correction with Q/A, you can check the exchange on one screen.
Effects after introduction
- I was able to resolve Q&A smoothly and start projects earlier.
Manufacturing (Transportation) and software Development
No more lost or corrupted review records
View in detail
Worries
- Large numbers of pointers are often registered in a single Excel file. Therefore, Excel is often broken.
Improvements
- Stability that only a dedicated tool can provide.
Effects after introduction
- Even with the same operation, file corruption is zero. I was able to point out more and more.